Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 187-195 , 01/01/2021

Techno-biofunctional aspect of seasoning powder from farm-raised sago palm weevil (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus) larvae

M. Chaijan, W. Panpipat

Abstract

This study aimed at characterising the techno-biofunctional aspect of seasoning powder made from sago palm weevil larvae (SP) in comparison with commercial products prepared from pork (CP) and chicken (CC). SP had a comparable moisture and water activity with CP and CC, following the Thai Community Product Standards. SP had higher protein, fat, carbohydrate, calcium, magnesium and potassium with lower ash and sodium (P<0.05). All samples had the same Fourier transform infrared spectra with different peak intensities. SP was darker (lower L*, higher a* and b*, and lower whiteness) than CP and CC. Different content and polarity of the intermediate (A<inf>285</inf>) and final (A<inf>420</inf>) products of the Maillard reaction was found. A<inf>420</inf> of the aqueous extract was distinctly higher than the acetone extract in all samples, suggesting the predominance of water soluble brown pigments. The highest total phenolic content and DPPH· inhibition was found in SP (P<0.05). The bulk density of SP was lower than CP and CC, which consequently affected the wettability. SP needed more time to become wet (P<0.05). The soup made from SP had the highest initial turbidity (P<0.05). All sensory aspects of SP were similar to CP and CC. Thus, SP can be categorised as an alternative functional food ingredient.

Document Type

Article

Source Type

Journal

Keywords

antioxidantfarm-raised insectfood additivefunctional food ingredientMaillard reaction products

ASJC Subject Area

Agricultural and Biological Sciences : Food ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences : Insect Science

Funding Agency

Walailak University


Bibliography


Chaijan, M., & Panpipat, W. (2021). Techno-biofunctional aspect of seasoning powder from farm-raised sago palm weevil (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus) larvae. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, 7(2) 187-195. doi:10.3920/JIFF2020.0025

Copy | Save