International Food Research Journal, Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 2657-2665 , 01/01/2018

Characterisation and physiochemical properties of mango peel pectin extracted by conventional and phase control microwave-assisted extractions

S. R. Sommano, P. Ounamornmas, M. Nisoa, S. Sriwattana, P. Page, G. Colelli

Abstract

Natural pectins from fruit peel have applications in the food industry as food stabilisers, sources of dietary fiber and as bio-waste. Here, we investigated the physicochemical properties of mango-peel pectin, after using conventional extraction and phase control microwaveassisted extraction (PCMAE). Due to its effectiveness as a bio-waste, a high peel-to-fruit weight ratio and fiber content, we used the Sam-pee mango cultivar from Northern Thailand for this study. The highest pectin yield found was 10.45% (w/w) after using PCMAE at 500W. The characterisation of extracted pectin revealed that the equivalent weight was higher when pectin was extracted using PCMAE, while the methoxyl content was lower and the degree of esterification remained constant (~55%). The PCMAE at 500W provided an emulsion activity pattern similar to that of the conventional extraction method. Phytochemical properties of the pectin however, measured by total phenolic content and antioxidant scavenging activities, were not significantly different (p < 0.05) between PCMAE and conventional methods. At a higher microwave radiation during the PCMAE (900W), the levels of antioxidants measured in the mango-peel pectins declined.

Document Type

Article

Source Type

Journal

Keywords

Agricultural wasteBy-productElectro-magnetic heatingFood stabiliserMangifera indica L.

ASJC Subject Area

Agricultural and Biological Sciences : Food Science

Funding Agency

Chiang Mai University


Bibliography


Sommano, S., Ounamornmas, P., Nisoa, M., Sriwattana, S., Page, P., & Colelli, G. (2018). Characterisation and physiochemical properties of mango peel pectin extracted by conventional and phase control microwave-assisted extractions. International Food Research Journal, 25(6) 2657-2665.

Copy | Save