Abstract

Amidst changing climatic conditions, accurately predicting reservoir inflows in an extreme event is challenging and inevitable for reservoir management. This study proposed an innovative strategy under such circumstances through rigorous experimentation and investigations using 18 years of monthly data collected from the Huai Nam Sai reservoir in the southern region of Thailand. The study employed a two-step approach: (1) isolating extreme and normal events using quantile regression (QR) at the 75th, 80th, and 90th quantiles and (2) comparing the forecasting performance of individual machine learning models and their combinations, including Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). Forecasting accuracy was assessed at four lead times—3, 6, 9, and 12 months—using ten-fold cross-validation, resulting in 16 model configurations for each forecast period. The results show that combining quantile regression (QR) to distinguish between extreme and normal events with hybrid models significantly improves the accuracy of monthly reservoir inflow forecasting, except for the 9-month lead time, where the XG model continues to deliver the best performance. The top-performing models, based on normalized scores for 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month-ahead forecasts, are XG-MLR-75, RF-XG-80, XG-75, and XG-RF-75, respectively. Another crucial finding of this research is the uneven decline in prediction accuracy as lead time increases. Notably, the model performed best at t + 9, followed by t + 3, t + 12, and t + 6, respectively. This pattern is influenced by model characteristics, error propagation, temporal variability, data dynamics, and seasonal effects. Improving the accuracy and efficiency of hybrid model forecasting can greatly enhance hydrological operational planning and management.