Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 1837-1855 , 01/08/2025
Spatio–temporal enhanced anomaly detection in FRP bridge monitoring using MPCA, biGRU, and attention mechanisms
Abstract
Accurate structural behavior interpretation via finite element models is often disrupted by uncertainties, while data-driven approaches can struggle with long datasets, complex fluctuations, and the omission of essential spatio-temporal features. Additionally, these methods are limited by their reliance on interpolative predictions. This paper introduces a novel, model-free approach that integrates Moving Principal Component Analysis (MPCA), bidirectional gated recurrent units (biGRU), and attention mechanisms (AM) within an encoder–decoder (ED) architecture. MPCA reduces dimensional complexity, extracts spatial features, and consolidates them into new time-series data for subsequent analysis. The biGRU module captures past and future dependencies, while AM emphasizes most relevant information. Validated on a full-scale pedestrian bridge dataset, the presented MPCA–biGRU–AM model converges 19% faster than MPCA–GRU and reduces anomaly detection lag by 46–78%. Although its per-step processing time (8 ms) slightly exceeds that of MPCA–GRU (3 ms), the model demonstrates greater robustness across diverse damage scenarios. These results highlight its potential for real-time structural health monitoring by effectively capturing spatio-temporal patterns with computational efficiency.
Document Type
Article
Source Type
Journal
Keywords
Anomaly detectionDeep learningExtrapolative predictionSpatio-temporalStructural behavior
ASJC Subject Area
Engineering : Civil and Structural EngineeringEngineering : Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Funding Agency
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi
Dibiantara, D., Adha, A., Darmawan, M., Imjai, T., Russell, J., & Laory, I. (2025). Spatio–temporal enhanced anomaly detection in FRP bridge monitoring using MPCA, biGRU, and attention mechanisms. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 15(6) 1837-1855. doi:10.1007/s13349-025-00913-1